Defeater philosophy
WebAug 11, 2006 · Evidence. First published Fri Aug 11, 2006; substantive revision Mon Jul 28, 2014. For my own part, I think that if one were looking for a single phrase to capture the … Web(C) An undercutting defeater tries to show that one or more of an argument's premises do not adequately support the argument's conclusion Which of the following best describes …
Defeater philosophy
Did you know?
WebIn 2024, a philosophy paper was published called "Does the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism Defeat God's Beliefs?", which argued that if the EAAN provides the naturalist with a defeater for all of her beliefs, then an extension of it appears to provide God with a defeater for all of his beliefs. C. S. Lewis framing WebReformed Epistemology. Reformed epistemology is a thesis about the rationality of religious belief. A central claim made by the reformed epistemologist is that religious belief can be rational without any appeal to evidence or argument. There are, broadly speaking, two ways that reformed epistemologists support this claim.
WebDec 13, 2011 · One type of defeater might be something like this: science is wonderful, science is a great contribution, a great discovery, a great modern project but it’s incompatible with religious belief or some parts of religious belief. That could count against religious belief. That could be a kind of defeater. WebJul 23, 2024 · This is a normative defeater, characterized as “a doubt or belief that S ought to have that indicates that S’s belief that p is either false or unreliably formed or sustained” ( 2008, 44). Like mental state defeaters, these also function regardless of their truth-value or their epistemic status.
WebSep 9, 2024 · An epistemic defeater—possibly coinciding with an experience, a reason, a belief or a fact—is, broadly speaking, what actualizes this possibility. The extant literature … WebThis chapter explores global debunking arguments, debunking arguments that aim to give one a global defeater. I defend Alvin Plantinga’s view that global defeaters are possible and, once gained, are impossible to escape by reasoning. They thereby must be extinguished by other means: epistemically propitious actions, luck, or grace.
WebThe expression “epistemic defeasibility” refers to a belief’s or a proposition’s liability to lose, have it downgraded or be prevented from acquiring some positive epistemic status, such as—for instance—being justified, being warranted or being knowledge.
WebIn this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel (University of Toronto) examines the causal theory of knowledge proposed by Alvin Goldman in 1967, and then discusses the … sgf sedu esWeb2. The status of moral testimony, or testimony with moral content, has gained considerable attention in the recent literature. Authors working in this area tend to fall into one of two camps: Pessimists and Optimists.On the one hand, Pessimists argue that there is something problematic about relying on the say-so of others when it comes to moral issues, e.g., it … sgh coursessgge planilux clear hs codeWebApr 15, 2016 · This is the weekly Q & A blog post by our Research Professor in Philosophy, Dr. William Lane Craig. Question ... --like my belief that your name is Grant--is a properly … sgfm patient portalWebMar 31, 2024 · An epistemic defeater, broadly speaking, is that in terms of which the defeat of justification proceeds. The notion of an epistemic defeater is mostly associated with J. … sgg journauxWebWe are told that a defeater is evidence that would undermine a person’s justification but not how it does this. It cannot be that all evidence that weakens a belief is a defeater because this would make knowledge attainment much more difficult. papa johns coupons 2023WebThis volume is about the notion of 'defeat' in philosophy. The idea is that someone who has some knowledge, or a justified belief, can lose this knowledge or justified belief if they … papa john\u0027s cheese crust